Shortlink

Facebook Responds to Change of TOS

A couple of weeks ago, we updated our terms of use to clarify a few points for our users. A number of people have raised questions about our changes, so I’d like to address those here. I’ll also take the opportunity to explain how we think about people’s information.

Our philosophy is that people own their information and control who they share it with. When a person shares information on Facebook, they first need to grant Facebook a license to use that information so that we can show it to the other people they’ve asked us to share it with. Without this license, we couldn’t help people share that information.

One of the questions about our new terms of use is whether Facebook can use this information forever. When a person shares something like a message with a friend, two copies of that information are created—one in the person’s sent messages box and the other in their friend’s inbox. Even if the person deactivates their account, their friend still has a copy of that message. We think this is the right way for Facebook to work, and it is consistent with how other services like email work. One of the reasons we updated our terms was to make this more clear.

In reality, we wouldn’t share your information in a way you wouldn’t want. The trust you place in us as a safe place to share information is the most important part of what makes Facebook work. Our goal is to build great products and to communicate clearly to help people share more information in this trusted environment.

We still have work to do to communicate more clearly about these issues, and our terms are one example of this. Our philosophy that people own their information and control who they share it with has remained constant. A lot of the language in our terms is overly formal and protective of the rights we need to provide this service to you. Over time we will continue to clarify our positions and make the terms simpler.

Still, the interesting thing about this change in our terms is that it highlights the importance of these issues and their complexity. People want full ownership and control of their information so they can turn off access to it at any time. At the same time, people also want to be able to bring the information others have shared with them—like email addresses, phone numbers, photos and so on—to other services and grant those services access to those people’s information. These two positions are at odds with each other. There is no system today that enables me to share my email address with you and then simultaneously lets me control who you share it with and also lets you control what services you share it with.

We’re at an interesting point in the development of the open online world where these issues are being worked out. It’s difficult terrain to navigate and we’re going to make some missteps, but as the leading service for sharing information we take these issues and our responsibility to help resolve them very seriously. This is a big focus for us this year, and I’ll post some more thoughts on openness and these other issues soon.

Source: Facebook

Shortlink

Facebook: All Your Stuff is Ours, Even if You Quit

If you use Facebook, you should always be conscience of what information you put online. Also keep in mind, once its up there… its out there and taking it down doesn’t always mean its gone. So think twice before posting those pictures of you smoking your bong up online. In related news…

Facebook’s terms of service (TOS) used to say that when you closed an account on their network, any rights they claimed to the original content you uploaded would expire. Not anymore.

Now, anything you upload to Facebook can be used by Facebook in any way they deem fit, forever, no matter what you do later. Want to close your account? Good for you, but Facebook still has the right to do whatever it wants with your old content. They can even sublicense it if they want.

Read the full article as it breaks down the changes in the TOS.

Shortlink

Sirius XM Might Bite The Dust

In regards to my last post it appears that Sirius XM might be preparing for bankruptcy.

It has hired advisers to prepare for a possible bankruptcy filing, people involved in the process said.

That would, of course, be a grim turn of events for the normally upbeat Mr. Karmazin, Sirius XM’s chief executive, who had hoped to create a mobile entertainment juggernaut with stars like Howard Stern.

It is unclear how a bankruptcy would affect customers. Service is unlikely to be interrupted, but the company might have to terminate contracts with high-priced talent like Mr. Stern or Martha Stewart. – NY Times

So nothing to be alarmed with yet, but definitely something to watch out for in the future…

Shortlink

15 Companies that Might Not Survive 2009

Yahoo! Finance posted an interesting article that highlighted 15 companies that might not see 2010. It will be interesting to repay this article a visit in another 10 month’s and see if the article made any correct predictions.

A few companies mentioned include Six Flags, Chrysler, & Rite Aid. To see the rest of the list, click here.

Shortlink

Stoned Little Kid After Dentist

Hahaha…. poor kid.

Shortlink

Glass Pool Table

Some people out there finally figured out how to make a glass pool table… that well… works. Watch the video and it will explain the technology behind (ok, under) the table. Pretty sweet. I’m assuming this won’t be on sale at Walmart next weekend?